首页> 外文OA文献 >Medium term effects of including manual therapy in a pulmonary rehabilitation program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) : a randomized controlled pilot trial
【2h】

Medium term effects of including manual therapy in a pulmonary rehabilitation program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) : a randomized controlled pilot trial

机译:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的肺康复计划中纳入手动治疗的中期效果:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Objective: To investigate the effect of including manual therapy (MT) in a pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Background: The primary source of exercise limitation in people with COPD is dyspnea. The dyspnea is partly caused by changes in chest wall mechanics, with an increase in chest wall rigidity (CWR) contributing to a decrease in lung function. As MT is known to increase joint mobility, administering MT to people with COPD carries with it the potential to influence CWR and lung function. Methods: Thirty-three participants with COPD, aged between 55 and 70 years (mean = 65·5±4 years), were randomly assigned to three groups: pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) only, soft tissue therapy (ST) and PR, and ST, spinal manipulative therapy (SM), and PR. Outcome measures including forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), and the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale were recorded at 0, 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Results: There was a significant difference in FVC between the three groups at 24 weeks (P = 0·04). For the ST+SM+PR group versus PR only the increase was 0·40 l (CI: 0·02, 0·79; P = 0·03). No major or moderate adverse events (AE) were reported following the administration of 131 ST and 272 SM interventions. Discussion: The increase in FVC is a unique finding. Although the underlying mechanisms responsible for this outcome are not yet understood, the most likely explanation is the synergistic effect resulting from the combination of interventions. These results support the call for a larger clinical trial in the use of MT for COPD.
机译:研究设计:随机临床试验。目的:探讨在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺康复计划中纳入手动治疗(MT)的效果。背景:COPD患者运动受限的主要来源是呼吸困难。呼吸困难部分是由于胸壁力学改变引起的,胸壁刚度(CWR)的增加导致肺功能下降。由于已知MT可增加关节活动度,因此对COPD患者服用MT可能会影响CWR和肺功能。方法:将33名COPD参与者(年龄在55至70岁之间(平均= 65·5±4岁))随机分为三组:仅肺康复(PR),软组织治疗(ST)和PR,以及ST,脊柱手法治疗(SM)和PR。结果指标包括第一秒钟的强制呼气量(FEV1),强制肺活量(FVC),6分钟步行测试(6MWT),圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)以及医院焦虑和抑郁(HAD)量表。在0、8、16和24周记录。结果:在24周时,三组之间的FVC有显着差异(P = 0·04)。对于ST + SM + PR组与PR相比,仅增加了0·40 l(CI:0·02、0·79; P = 0·03)。在进行131 ST和272 SM干预后,未报告严重或中度不良事件(AE)。讨论:FVC的增加是一个独特的发现。尽管尚不清楚造成这种结果的潜在机制,但最可能的解释是干预措施组合产生的协同效应。这些结果支持了将MT用于COPD的大型临床试验的呼吁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号